Sunday, March 3, 2013

Tides Go In, Tides Go Out. You Can't Explain That!

Do we need the moon? Can the moon tell us about our evolution? Could we evolve without it?

The answers are probably more interesting than you think...but before I answer them I think we should  have a moon review! Most people know general facts about the moon (unless you are Bill O'Reilly) but I will briefly summarize anything that will be used later, along with lots of pictures!


Hopefully after this you not only know more about our moon but also know much more about the evolution of life on this planet.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Moon Information


Size and Distance:
The moon is about 1/4 the diameter of the Earth and it is 238,857 miles away, receding away about an inch every year.

Gravitational Pull and Tides:
Its large size creates a gravitational pull that causes our ocean to be pulled up towards the moon as it orbits, creating high and low tides.

Tilt and Seasons:
Our planet is tilted about 23.5° and the moon keeps this tilt stable, varying only a few degrees. This stabilization causes four predictable seasons as the earth rotates around the sun. 

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Moon Formation
4.5 billion years ago Earth was still a ball of flowing lava and liquid iron. It was completely moonless, causing it to spin so fast it had an 8 hour day.

Planet Collision & Debris Orbit 
30 million years later a large planet partially collided with Earth, creating its 23.5° tilt and blasting off 70% of the molten crust. This debris became trapped in an orbit around Earth and within possibly one year had coalesced into the moon.

Core, Magnetic Field, & Tectonic Plates
While the moon formed with the light materials, the heavier materials reabsorbed into the Earth. This caused our planet to have 1 ½ cores, giving us a stronger gravitational field. The planet lost heat slower as a result and was able to create plate tectonics.

Early Distance and Pull 
Early after its formation, the moon was 10–15 times bigger in the sky because it was only 14,000 miles away. This close proximity causes the pull to be 200 times stronger. Oceans had yet to form so it pulled on the molten surface of the Earth and created waves more than half a mile high, twice a day. 

Cooling and Slowing
 
The planet and moon cooled to where Earth could retain water. They have remained gravitationally locked and the moon gradually slowed down the rotation of the Earth from 8 to 24 hours. 

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Scenario 1: Moon Disappears

It is easily seen that our moon has a large impact on the planet but do you think we actually NEED it? If it disappeared suddenly tonight would we notice? What if our planet never had one in the first place, would we still have evolved?

For those who watched Dragon Ball Z...Piccolo blew up the moon

To determine if we need it at all we need to look at two different scenarios of a moonless Earth! Since The Universe did this subject very well I have used images from the episode.

If our moon decided to bail on us suddenly, the Earth would immediately notice its absence.

Ocean Tides & Floods
Almost immediately the tides pulled by the moon drop back down which causes global tsunamis that erase islands and devastate coastal cities. This water has been estimated to be 50 feet+, which almost drowns the whole state of Florida. Once the water has been redistributed globally  it rushes to the next strongest gravitational pull: the sun. The pull of the sun on the oceans is 1/3 that of the moon's and it is creating not lunar tides but solar tides, which are significantly weaker.

Sea Currents & Climate
 The sudden change in the tides will cause ocean currents to shift dramatically, causing changes in the weather patterns globally. These abrupt climate changes will cause crop failure in many areas. On land, birds and insects that migrate seasonally or rely on regional plant life are thrown into chaos and will most likely go extinct. After the first level of collapse everything that relies on them will follow suit, causing an mass breakdown of ecosystems. 

Moonlight & Disorientation
Mass extinction is caused by the disappearance of light from the moon because many animals determine their mating periods and feeding times by the moon. Without the moonlight, turtles would not know when to move inland to lay eggs, fish will be disorientated on when to lay eggs as well, and algae will stop moving to the surface which will cause many to lose their main food resource. The whole ecology of the ocean is tuned to light and without it every organism will eventually be completely disrupted.

Erratic Tilts & Environment
If humans somehow survive the collapse of global ecosystems, we still have to deal with the long term issues. Earth's regulated tilt is almost constant and its caused by the gravitational connection to the moon, which acts as a stabilizer. This causes us to not only have 4 seasons but keeps us from falling over and freezing the poles. Mars does not have a large gravitational body to keep it on a constant tilt so the planet over several hundred thousand years goes into fits of varying tilts by up to 90°. This will literally cause the ice covered poles of Mars to fall over towards the sun. The other planets also pull causing it to swing around erratically. This extreme variation in tilt is a mirror of what would happen to the Earth without the moon. Without the moon over time the Earth will go through massive environmental disruption over and over again as it wildly turn its the poles towards the sun, causing jungles on the poles and ice on the equator.


If the moon disappeared everything today would be affected because everything evolved with the moon’s influence. Well, if we would be wiped out if you took it away from us now, what if we never had one in the first place?

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Scenario 2: Moon Never Formed


Our planet would be unrecognizable without an original moon and I can say with confidence that large brained primates would never have evolved. Let me break that claim down!

We must start back again when the planet was forming but this time leave out the moon.

 Formation of Moonless Earth 
4.5 billion years the fast spin of the Earth creates a shorter day. Earth’s crust is still molten but no planet will collide with it so no crust is blown off. The Earth also keeps its original core size instead of having 1 ½ cores, causing there to be no plate tectonics, no mountain ranges, and water covering most of the crust with a higher sea level. The planets tilt is unregulated by the moon and is subjected to the gravitational pull from the sun and planets. Without the moon the planet has a totally black night.

Obviously the planet is different without the moon but just stating all of this does not really help you predict what a moonless Earth would be like today, so we have to take these different results and allow them to play through 4 billion years and see what we get.

Rotation & Wind
In the beginning, the moonless Earth spins fast creating an 8 hour day that will slow to 12 hours in 4 billion years.  This is at least double the speed and it has major effects on the planet inside and out. The quick rotation causes global howling winds where in some places could reach 200 mph causing thicker storms and violent waves that batter coastlines. The winds also cause more jet streams, turbulence, and lightning.  It is a very loud and chaotic world so if complex animals arise they must find a way to communicate despite shrieking winds. The sound and smell communication and detection that dominates our world would most likely never evolve because of the exceptionally loud and windy nature of the planet. So animals must use either the other known systems or do something completely unknown to us. Visually, it could be using limbs or colors to communicate or be the development of extra limbs to express messages silently. These extra limbs could also be used for stability and protection from the elements when the weather becomes violent, as it will often do. There could also be a development of a specialized auditory system that cancels out the wind’s shrieking sound or be tuned specifically to their species frequency and are able to hear it through all other noise. Perhaps if most things are grounded, there will be a development of an acute ability to sense nearby vibrations on the ground. Beyond these there could be another sensory system that could be developed that we do not experience on this planet. If there IS complex life, it’s nothing like we know today.

Rotation & Magnetic Fields 
The rotation speed causes the smaller core to churn faster and produce an enhanced magnetic field that more effectively blocks solar particles and causes very large and spectacular auroras. This enhancement will cause less radiation to affect the replicating life forms. Mutations are the driving force of evolution and reducing the radiation will decrease the amount of mutations that can be chosen for or against. This will slow the rate at which life can evolve and adapt and will probably cause the majority of life forms to maintain a simpler form. This planet does not have the stability we have and will experience extremely random environmental changes. The only animals we know that can survive through extreme environmental change are simple bacteria.  Complex animals cannot do this as they need stability to build up their adaptations. Without the stable climate to give the time and without the rate of mutations to drive the change, complex creatures are going to have a very hard time developing if they develop how we think they do.    

Rotation & Length of Day
When there was an 8 hour day it created an environment which only gave organisms 4 hours to absorb sunlight and 4 hours of complete darkness. All organisms today came from ancestors that either absorbed sunlight as their energy resource or eventually ate organisms that absorbed sunlight.  With only 4 hours of sun exposure that is filtered through a stronger magnetic field, the life that could arise would most likely not be similar to anything we know. 4 hour days could also lead to less time for metabolizing and thus shorter life spans, less time for seeking mates, and less time to find resources. With darkness at night animals might have to develop enhanced sensory systems to use starlight or even have night vision goggle-like capabilities. The system that could develop like this would be truly an interesting site.


Axial Tilt & Climate
The difference in the tilt will cause the greatest amount of distress and will be the main driving force holding complex life back OR possibly becoming push to invent something brand new. Without a moon to stabilize the tilt, Earth shifts back and forth over millions years which shifts climates into extreme opposites. Our planet today wobbles from its tilt and over a period of 26,000 years the tilt will vary a few degrees but it is highly predictable because it is regulated by the moon. Without the moon the Earth would actually wobble more slowly which would cause the variations to become more unpredictable and dramatic. If you think of a spinning top; the faster you spin the less it wobbles and as soon as it slows down it begins to wobble wildly...but slower. A moonless Earth could be wobbling for 30,000 up to 50,000 years and with the higher numbers it can cause the planet to fall over and switch the positions of the poles with the equator. This will cause the poles to melt rapidly and disrupt ocean currents/weather patterns and sea levels at the equator, causing a never ending shift between bursts of adaptation and mass extinction.  This is the epitome of chaos and whatever life could develop here would be the textbook definition of an creature from another world.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Back to my original questions: 

Do we need the moon?  Can the moon tell us much about our evolution? Could we evolve without it?


The first scenario of a sudden disappearance of the moon can answer if we still need it to be in our sky. If the moon was removed, almost all life on this planet will be devastatingly crippled through either direct disruption or through the collapse of the established ecosystems. Most complex animals depend on several hundred different organisms to survive, and they are dependent without even knowing it. Even after the collapse of the ocean’s ecosystem, the mass extinctions, weather disruptions, tsunamis, and everything else terrible that can be conceived, we are still not done. Now we are subjected to the tug-of-war between the sun and planets for our axial tilt and our planet will lose every time. So yes we still need the moon because life has evolved alongside it and has become dependent on it for its current existence.

The second scenario of an Earth developing without a moon can answer the following questions: does the moon tells us about our evolution and can we evolve without it?  Our planet from the beginning would be a different world. The lack of a collision causes the core to be smaller and the planet to cool off faster. This cooler planet never develops plate tectonics and thus has very little mountain ranges or landmasses, causing the sea level to be higher.  Without the moon to slow us down the planet spins at double the speed, shortening the day and causing shrieking winds, extreme storms, and violent waves.  This rotation speed also churns the core and causes a stronger magnetic field that blocks radiation and slows the mutations that drive life. The planets tilt is also unregulated without a moon causing it to vary wildly, shifting the poles to the equator and back again. This extreme environment restricts the amount of complexity that can develop, and any organisms that do develop must survive in environments that shift to extreme opposites often and randomly.  This extreme world would most likely create organisms that are like nothing we have ever seen before, and would never allow the evolution of any of the ancestral groups that lead to our species or anything alive today. The moon tells us that our evolution needed a weaker magnetic field, slower days, calmer winds, plate tectonics, consistent tilt, stable environments, and moonlight to create the ancestors that would eventually become all of the life we know today.  Sure, life can develop without these requirements but this life would be on its own path far away from our own.

So...primates would never exist because there would be no tall trees for them to drive their development. There would be no food to feed them because the strong winds would not allow the development of the flowering plants, and thus the evolution of most of the insects. The lack of plate tectonics partnered with the lack of tides would never create the inner tidal pools and gradual shorelines that helped the first land animals evolve. The shrieking winds would not allow the development of our ancestor’s vocal or hearing abilities which takes away our language, probably the most important part of humanity.  Our ability to stand tall and upright, speak, see, hear, taste, and even think has been taken away.  No part of the primate could exist without the moon.


Our moon made us who we are.  Maybe we should look up at the sky and take notice a little more, and maybe even tell that big ball of ancient debris “thank you!”!


Friday, February 8, 2013

Ridiculous and Thrown Out Creationist Claims


If you are an atheist, or even just someone who understands and accepts biological evolution as true, then you have most likely been approached by someone who not only disagrees but has arguments against evolution that they claim are unanswered and devastating. I personally have been receiving them since I was in high school and ever since, I have heard the same arguments being used. It’s easy to find the source to most of these common arguments since there are only a handful of creationists that claim to be “creation scientists” and there are only a few creation science websites that are used as a creation science resource.

These are some of the most common websites used by creationists
§         Answers in Genesis: Extensively used creation science resource
o      Ken Ham
§         Creation Science Evangelism Creation seminar online
o       Kent Hovind
§         Creation Evidences Museum Photos of the controversial evidence at the Paluxy River (Texas)
o      Carl Edward Baugh
§         Creation, Evolution and Science Ministries Creation series of videos
o       Russ Miller
§         Living Waters Publications  Web site includes the supernatural origin of the Bible
o       Ram Comfort and Kurt Cameron


Not all creationist arguments are linked to the sources above and not all are arguments that have been used for years, but there are a lot that are being used today that have persisted through time and are from the exact same people. Then there are those that are new on the scene that are found on YouTube from a range of creationists, "professional" and not. 

Below I am going to list a few ridiculous claims made by creationists of all levels and then list some arguments that are common today but have actually been listed as "do not use" or "avoid" by Answers in Genesis. 

There are so many ridiculous claims...like "fossils came from the devil" and "chickens have teeth genes because they used teeth in the Garden of Eden." Since there are so many, I am going to list only a few that are said by "professional" creationists that you can find on Youtube.


Ridiculous professional and non-professional creationist claims:


1.) Moon craters prove Noah’s Flood: 
NephilimFree – Youtube creationist, Conservapedia source

A creationist on Youtube claimed that the craters on the moon are not from impacts over billions of years but are from ice ejected from the Earth during Noah’s Flood. Again, there is a secret ocean that escaped through the mid-ocean ridges and as the cracks opened the crust of the earth fell in, ejecting the water at super sonic speeds skyward. This super sonic water then shot at the moon and the ice pelted the moon with craters. He also says that there is microorganisms and plankton in the ice on the Moon. 


  


2.) God loves Horses and Whales
Dr. Hugh Ross 

Here is a video of Dr. Hugh Ross stating that the horse and whale fossils that show evolution are actually real but that they are evidence of special creation. He claims that mutations have such a low chance of being beneficial (10,000/1) that you must have a small body size and small generation time to actually adapt. This is why we find change in labs because the organisms are so small. He claims that horses and whales have a small population size, a large body size, and long generation time, and all of this adds up to a 0% chance of survival. The reason he gives for why we find so many horse and whale fossils is that they are not because they are transitional but because "God loves horses and whales. He knows because of their huge size and small pop they will go extinct rapidly. When they do he makes new ones." He is actually accepting the existence to the horse and whale transitional fossils! But God just kept recreating them because he loved them. 




3.) The Ricocheting Comet Immune to Physics
Kent Hovind – Creation Science Evangelical

This is another explanation for where the water from Noah’s flood came from which combines with the previous secret ocean claim. This claim has so many aspects to it but since it all links to the comet, it is the leading role. Once upon a time there was a comet that followed no normal laws of physics. It bounced around our solar system where it broke apart around the other planets and created all of the planets’ rings and craters and then eventually somehow escaped their gravity. Once it arrived at earth, our magnetic field caused it to break apart and redistribute a lot of ice to the poles causing the earth to gain a tilt and crack the crust, releasing the secret ocean. It also flash froze the mammoths (and all other preserved in ice), made the vapor canopy in the sky fall, and created the mountains.

Everything Kent Hovind claims that was caused by one physics-ignoring comet:
§         All the planets rings
§         All the planets’ and moons’ craters
§         The cracks on the ocean floor
§         Mountains
§         Grand Canyon
§         Collapse of a vapor canopy
§         All animals preserved in ice
§         Earth’s tilt
§         Seasons
§         Earth’s craters
§         Ice Ages



If you have the patience, the original video is very long but if you can make it through you will learn about many of the common arguments for Noah's flood.  This video also has many claims that will make most people laugh. If a creationist takes one of his claims against evolution then you must take everything else along with it! Including a few gems...

§         0:18:00 -  Plants are not alive because they do not have blood or breathe through nostrils
§         0:20:30 -  Insects are not alive because they absorbs oxygen through their “skin” and not through their nostrils
§         0:33:50 - The tectonic ridges are because the flood waters burst through them and not evidence for plate tectonics
§         0:57:50 -  There is not a drop of water found on Mars




4.) Dinosaurs are dragons - Small nostrils create flames
Dr. Richard Kent

This is the claim that before the flood there was really high oxygen levels but after the flood it dropped to today's levels, and this caused breathing problems for dinosaurs because they had small nostrils but large body sizes (because there arent small dinosaurs or anything). The low levels caused the dinosaurs to breathe in and out so quickly through their small nostrils that they caught fire and became the fire breathing dragons from the bible.





Now here is an example of a non-professional who decided to make a Youtube video about his own made up claims against evolution. These often make you question if they are just a troll or not. 

1.) The order of the fossil record is because similar animals huddle together when they get cold.

Enough said. 





Next are creationist claims that are still commonly used today that have been listed on Answers in Genesis as arguments you should no longer use as evidence against evolution. If you receive one of these, try telling them that the claim they are making is no longer accepted as a valid argument by current "professional" creationist Ken Ham, the creator of Answers in Genesis and the Creation Museum.


Arguments listed as "do not use"

  • There are no beneficial mutations.
    • Now supposed to recognize that mutations are either neutral, positive, or negative depending on the environment
  • Woolly mammoths were flash frozen during the Flood catastrophe.
  • If we evolved from apes, apes shouldn’t exist today.
    • Creationists are supposed to acknowledge this: “In an evolutionary worldview, mankind did not evolve from apes but from an apelike ancestor, from which both humans and apes of today supposedly evolved.”
  • No new species have been produced.
    • Creationist supposed to accept new species being created. Must use the word “kind” (http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/aid/v3/n1/zonkeys-ligers-wholphin) that is purely defined by creationists based on no scientific characteristics and claim evolution cant change different “kinds” into each other. This means they accept beneficial mutations that change color, form, and everything else to adapt organisms to an environment. A fox and a dog must be linked to one “kind” on the ark. This IS evolution.
  • If we evolved from apes, apes shouldn’t exist today.
    • Must acknowledge:  “In an evolutionary worldview, mankind did not evolve from apes but from an apelike ancestor, from which both humans and apes of today supposedly evolved.”
  • Evolution is just a theory
    • ““Theory” has a stronger meaning in scientific fields than in general usage; it is better to say that evolution is just a hypothesis or one model to explain the untestable past.”
  • There was a water vapor canopy surrounding earth before the Flood
    • Now supposed to follow that Noah’s flood waters came from within the depths of the Earth instead of Kent Hovind’s claim of the water being in a vapor canopy.
  • Paluxy tracks prove that humans and dinosaurs co-existed. 
    • Current acclaimed man tracks are disproven and must take the view that there are mysterious things about the tracks that COULD show something, leaving the option open though there is no evidence for man tracks left. “Even though it would now be improper for creationists to continue to use the Paluxy data as evidence against evolution, in the light of these questions, there is still much that is not known about the tracks and continued research is in order.